Patenting Pc Software program In India: An Evaluation – Mental Property

Patenting Pc Software program In India: An Evaluation – Mental Property

To print this text, all you want is to be registered or login on


Software program mental property, generally often known as software program IP,
is a pc program or code that’s protected by regulation from
unauthorized copying, theft, or different makes use of. The company that
generated or obtained the rights to that code or software program owns the
mental property (IP) related to it. It’s prohibited for
another person to make use of it with out your permission. Supply code and
object code are two kinds of pc software program. Software program
improvement requires numerous expertise, time, and energy, so it is
solely affordable that you just’d need to protect your whole exhausting
work. Unauthorized people can copy and use pc packages.
Copyright legal guidelines could defend your precise program and app supply code.
Patent regulation could present safety for software program ideas and
developments. Software program, in its broadest which means, is a set of
directions or packages that inform a pc the best way to carry out
particular duties. Each transaction or work was made extra
simple and easy accessibility to all of the important data
and platforms for communication with the daybreak of the digital period.
Software program and pc packages confront fierce competitors within the
market, and they’re significantly delicate to financial loss
as a result of they might be accessed by customers with out paying, and they’re
additionally vulnerable to piracy and copying. Moreover, on account of extreme
rivalry, there’s a appreciable threat of turning into out of date very
quick, as opponents could instantly introduce a aggressive
product. Software program safety beneath the IPR system won’t solely
safeguard the proprietor’s financial pursuits however may also
encourage innovation and creativity.


Software program or pc packages aren’t the patentable topic
matter in and of itself. Nevertheless, there are some distinctive
circumstances wherein pc packages or software program could also be
patentable. To 
receive a patent for software program improvement, the next
main figuring out elements have to be demonstrated

  1. the invention should comprise patentable material;

  2. the invention have to be able to industrial utility;

  3. the invention have to be novel;

  4. the invention should contain an creative step (be non-obvious);

  5. The invention’s disclosure within the patent utility should
    meet sure formal and substantive requirements.

‘New invention’ means any invention or expertise that
has not been anticipated by publication in any doc or utilized in
the nation or elsewhere on this planet earlier than the date of submitting of
a patent utility with full specification, i.e., the topic
matter has not fallen into the general public area or that it doesn’t
type a part of the cutting-edge,” in accordance with Part
2(1)(I) of the Patents Act 1970. Part 3(okay) of the Patents Act of
1970, however, specifies that “a mathematical or
enterprise course of, a pc program per se, or algorithms”
aren’t improvements and thus not patentable. The legislative intent
behind the usage of the time period “per se” was elucidated within the
Joint Committee Report after they launched the Patents (Modification)
Act, 2002, which said, “This modification has been proposed
as a result of typically the pc program could embrace sure different
issues, ancillary thereto or developed thereon.” If they’re
innovations, the aim right here is to not deny them a patent. The
pc packages themselves, however, aren’t meant to
be patentable.

Whatever the Parliament’s reasoning, it will possibly nonetheless be
claimed that the which means of part 3(okay) of the Patents Act 1970 is
that whereas not all software program is eligible for patent safety,
real instances the place software program meets the entire situations for
patentability have to be granted a patent. The necessity for a stringent
inspection on software program patent functions is vital as a result of
patent safety protects the patent’s concept, which can restrict
inventiveness with the patented concept. Consequently, if the software program
has a “technical impact,” it may be protected beneath the
patent system.

Based on the handbook, as patents are given in all domains of
expertise, it’s important to find out whether or not the strategy/course of
belongs to the technological space, i.e. whether or not the claimed
creative step has any technical development over the earlier artwork.
Consequently, the examiner examines the interaction of software program and
{hardware} with a purpose to deliver a computer-related invention or software program
exterior the scope of the phrase “per se” in part 3(okay)
(the place {hardware} is greater than the general-purpose machine). If the
invention passes the triple check of novelty, creative step, and
industrial applicability, the claims to those gadgets could also be
regarded patentable in circumstances the place the gadgets are claimed
together with modern or identified pc packages to make
their functioning closing.

Moreover, as a result of pc packages are included within the record
of the non-patentable material beneath the Patents Act of 1970,
the following necessities have to be met to ensure that
the software program to be patentable:

  1. The invention is expounded to a pc, the place software program is
    essential and gives a technical impact;

  2. The invention is greater than a technical impact supplied by
    software program, in that there’s a tangible factor that interacts with
    the software program, ensuing within the software program being a group of
    software program and tangible components.

With regards to the safety of concepts and the performance
of the software program, a patent could be a wonderful possibility. Nevertheless, in
order to be given a patent, the software program have to be greater than an
algorithm and have to be a technological invention that qualifies for
such a patent. Nevertheless, if the software program is expounded to an invention
and constitutes a element of that invention, it may be
patentable. To keep away from the declare of sec. 3 (okay), it’s essential to
display that {hardware}, along with software program or a pc
program, is an integral facet of the invention.


Most fashionable applied sciences, similar to vehicles, washing machines,
and fridges, are depending on pc packages, because the Delhi
Excessive Courtroom discovered within the case of FeridAllani v.
Union of India & Ors. [2019].
 All of those
have pc packages integrated into them indirectly. As a
consequence, if a pc program is rejected solely as a result of Part 3(okay)
prohibits patentability, present innovations will lose their potential
to be protected. The courtroom elaborated on the patentability of
pc packages regardless that Part 3(okay) is an obstacle to such
innovations on this case. The applicant, FeridAllani, filed for a
patent for “a technique and equipment for accessing data
sources and providers on the net,” in accordance with the fundamental details
of the case. The patent utility was denied by the IPO on account of a
violation of Part 3 of the Patent Act (okay). The matter was
referred to the IPAB, which confirmed the rejection, and a writ
petition was filed with the Delhi Excessive Courtroom.

To start with, the Courtroom clarified that the patentability bar
solely applies to “pc packages per se,” not all
innovations primarily based on pc packages. The Courtroom held that stating
that pc packages aren’t patentable can be regressive,
given the prominence of pc packages in fashionable gadgets similar to
ovens, vehicles, and fridges. Innovations primarily based on
synthetic intelligence, blockchain, and different digital merchandise
wouldn’t be patentable if this have been the case.

The courtroom additionally said that an invention is patentable if it
shows a technological impact or contribution, even whether it is
primarily based on a pc program. Consequently, this case is among the
most vital selections in India on the subject of patenting
software program as a result of it particularly states that Part 3(okay) doesn’t
apply to all discoveries involving pc packages or
software program.

In Enercon India Ltd. v. AloysWobben
, an identical judgment was made within the context of
a pc program designed for greater energy output via wind
generators, which was challenged beneath Part 3(okay). The courtroom said
that a pc program that performs a technical course of similar to
controlling a wind turbine to realize a most energy output can not
be referred to as a “pc program per se,” regardless of the actual fact
that wind generators can’t be managed manually and require
superior pc expertise to take action. Based on the courtroom, a
patent declare containing merely some course of steps to hold out a
technical course of or obtain a ‘technical
impact’ wouldn’t be topic to the objection ensuing
from Part 3(okay) of the Patents Act.


The software program does, in actual fact, play a major half in
society’s survival and progress. The world runs on quite a few
pc software program packages, from our smartphones and smartwatches
to heavy equipment and industrial capital. Consequently, it’s
turning into more and more very important to safeguard and promote inventors’
rights within the creation of software program via a stronger patent
enforcement mechanism. The thought of permitting software program to be patented
has been nicely obtained by Indian courts. We now have established
courtroom precedents on the patentability of pc packages or
software program. Because the Indian financial system turns into more and more digitized,
with software program more and more forming the idea of innovation and
enterprise competitors, future courtroom selections will undoubtedly support
in solidifying a clearer interpretation of Part 3(okay) and its
applicability to software program and pc packages. It can not afford
to exclude software program from patentability with a purpose to flourish within the
financial system.

Patenting Pc Software program In India: An Evaluation

The content material of this text is meant to offer a normal
information to the subject material. Specialist recommendation ought to be sought
about your particular circumstances.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: Mental Property from India

Patent Legislation in India

Anand & Anand

The Patents Act 1970, together with the Patents Guidelines 1972, got here into power on twentieth April 1972, changing the Indian Patents and Designs Act 1911. The Patents Act was largely primarily based on the suggestions of the Ayyangar Committee Report headed by Justice N. Rajagopala Ayyangar. One of many suggestions was the allowance of solely course of patents with regard to innovations referring to medication, medicines, meals and chemical substances.